|
by Jeffrey Nelson, D.O., FACOG
There are a multitude
of factors contributing to a couples inability
to conceive, including male
factor, uterine factor, tubal factor, pelvic factor,
and ovulatory dysfunction. The majority of these factors
can be circumvented through the application of advanced
reproductive treatments like
IVF, in vitro fertilization and ICSI. IVF
success depends on three primary components: good
quality embryos, a technically uncomplicated embryo
transfer, and a receptive intrauterine environment for
embryo implantation. 
When we talk about
"good quality embryos" the two most common
criteria discussed are rate of embryo growth, and embryo
grade. The rate of embryo growth is determined by the
number of cells, or blastomeres, contained within the
embryo on a specific day of development.
For example,
on the third day following egg collection and insemination,
an appropriately developing embryo should consist of
six to eight cells. It is believed that embryos growing
at a slower rate have a less favorable chance of implantation.
The grade of the embryo is determined by the appearance
of the individual blastomeres. A high-grade embryo contains
blastomeres that are symmetrical in size and shape,
without evidence of intracellular fragmentation. Conversely,
embryos made up of asymmetrical cells with a significant
degree of fragmentation, are less likely to successfully
initiate a pregnancy.
There is another critically
important component of the embryo that does not get
as much attention. This important structural component
is the elastic outer shell, which surrounds the embryo,
known as the zona pellucida (ZP). The ZP is formed from
a matrix of various proteins that are secreted by the
egg, and in photographs appears as a translucent halo
enveloping the embryo. The ZP has several important
functions. During the process of fertilization, it serves
to prevent the access of more than one sperm to the
egg.
Following fertilization, the ZP keeps the cells
of the embryo together during early development, until
the embryo reaches the blastocyst stage. At the blastocyst
stage, the embryo has enough structural integrity that
it no longer needs the protection of the ZP. In fact,
it is mandatory that the blastocyst break free of the
ZP, once it is in the uterine cavity, in order to successfully
implant within the uterine wall. This eventual escape
from the ZP by the expanding blastocyst is called embryo
hatching.
Standard IVF
protocols include culturing of embryos within the laboratory
for three days, followed by transfer of cleavage stage
embryos (6-8 cells), on day three, to the uterine cavity.
Following transfer, the embryos must continue to progress
to the blastocyst stage, shed the ZP, and embed into
the uterine wall. In 1989 Cohen and his co-investigators
observed a higher implantation rate in patients undergoing
IVF, who had the ZP of their embryos mechanically opened.
They therefore hypothesized that artificially creating
a gap in the ZP might serve to facilitate embryo hatching
and implantation. Microscopic manipulation of the ZP,
in order to augment hatching and implantation, subsequently
became known as "assisted hatching".
Prospective
randomized clinical studies have been performed in order
to evaluate the effectiveness of assisted
hatching in IVF. Several studies report a significant
increase in embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy
rates, in select groups of patients whose embryos have
undergone this procedure. These select patient groups
include women greater than 38 years of age, those with
elevated day three FSH levels, couples with previous
IVF failures, embryos with an abnormal appearing zona
pellucida, and when using previously cryopreserved embryos.
Some IVF programs will globally perform assisted hatching
on all embryos prior to transfer, but the data on this
is less clear.
A variety of
techniques have been employed to perform assisted
hatching procedure. These techniques are designed
to assist the embryo in the timely shedding of the ZP,
and they share a common endpoint of either thinning
out or completely perforating a focal area of this surrounding
membrane. Some embryologists will perform assisted hatching
by mechanically piercing the ZP with a specifically
designed sharp pipette. Currently, the most commonly
practiced method of assisted hatching involves exposure
of the embryo to an acidified media called acidified
tyrodes solution. This acidic solution is microscopically
applied to a focal area of the ZP to induce thinning.
Complications and consequent
diminished pregnancy rates can result from assisted
hatching if the embryo is damaged, or if the size of
the defect in the ZP is not precise. When the defect
is too small, the embryo may get pinched and damaged.
When the hole in the ZP is too large, the embryo may
escape prematurely which will compromise its development.
The described techniques therefore require a highly
skilled and experienced embryologist, in order to be
performed in a way that is beneficial and not detrimental
to the health and viability of the embryo.
Laser
A new technique for assisted hatching has been introduced,
which we now routinely use at Huntington Reproductive
Center. This technique involves the creation of a precise
gap in the ZP of selected embryos using a 1.48 micron
infrared diode laser. This specifically designed laser
system includes the laser, which serves as the energy
source to create an opening in the ZP, and a computer
which allows the operator to precisely control the laser
energy output, laser pulse duration, and gap size. This
system has many benefits when compared to the more standard
mechanical and acidified tyrodes techniques.
The computer assisted
laser method is more precise, resulting in a more consistent
ZP opening. This technique is also more quickly mastered
by the embryologist, with a quality outcome less dependent
on the skill and experience of the technician. Laser
assisted hatching takes less time and does not expose
the embryos to potentially adverse chemicals, so embryos
spend less time out of optimal culture conditions. It
also requires significantly less physical manipulation
of the embryos. The cumulative effect of these factors
is to minimize the stress placed upon the embryo during
the performance of assisted hatching. This in turn should
then translate into improved implantation and pregnancy
rates. We have completed a limited study at our center,
which confirmed the laser is safe, and was associated
with excellent implantation and pregnancy rates.
Assisted hatching has
demonstrated the potential for improving embryo implantation
rates, and clinical pregnancy rates in select patient
groups undergoing IVF. Infertile couples considering
advanced assisted reproductive treatments should consult
with their reproductive specialist regarding their candidacy
for assisted hatching.
References:
Cohen J, Inge KL, Suzmann
M (1989) Video-cinematography of fresh and cryopreserved
embryos: a retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology
and implantation. Fertil Steril 51:820-7.
Cohen J, Elsner C,
Kort H et al (1990) Impairment of the hatching process
following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation
by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod
5:7-13.
|